The x-ray contrast medium are compounds indicated for the enhancement of
radiography contrast in x-ray image such as : computerized tomography
(CT), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), digestive sytem, biliary
system, Intravenous urography, phlebography of extremities, venography,
arteriography, visualization of body cavities (e.g arthrography,
hysterosalpingography, fistulography, dacrycistography), myelography,
ventriculography, cisternography and other diagnostic procedures.
CONTRAST MEDIUM PREPARATIONS
There
are three contrast medium preparations used in x-ray examinations ;
Barium (Ba), Iodine (I) and Thorium (Th) but generally only Barium and
Iodine preparation that still used in x-ray examination.
BARIUM PREPARATIONS
This is a suspension of powdered barium sulphate in a water. Barium
sulphate is insoluble and chemically quite inert. Soluble salts of
barium are very poisonous and only pharmaceutical quality barium
sulphate should be used. Barium depends for its radiopacity on its
electron density (reflected indirectly by its atomic number) which is
much greater than the radio-opacity of soft-tissue and greater than the
radio-opacity of bone. Barium sulfate, an insoluble white powder. This
is mixed with water and some additional ingredients to make the contrast
agent. As the barium sulfate doesn't dissolve, this type of contrast
agent is an opaque white mixture. It is only used in the digestive
tract; it is usually administered as an enema (for osepahogography,
gaster, and intestinum tenue) or via rectal for colon.. After the
examination, it leaves the body with the feces.
Should barium leak
from the G.I. tract into tissues or into a body cavity eg. mediastinum
or peritoneum, it can cause a fibrogranulomatous reaction. Spill into
the bronchial tree is a manageable problem unless it is gross, when
death may ensue; weak barium preparations have been used for
bronchography. After oral administration, it may compact in the large
bowel causing constipation and occasionally may precipitate obstruction
if there is a predisposing pathology.
The ideal barium sulphate/water mixture has yet to be developed, but the following properties are of utmost importance.
a)
Particle size. Ordinary barium sulphate particles are coarse, measuring
several millimetres in size, but ultrafine milling of the crude barium
sulphate results in 50 per cent of the particles having a size of
between 5 Ecm and l5lCm. As rate of sedimentation is proportional to
particle size, the smaller the barium sulphate particle the more stable
the suspension.
(b) Non-ionic medium. The charge on the barium
sulphate particle influences the rate of aggregation of the particles.
Charged particles attract each other and thus form larger particles
which sediment more readily. They tend to do this even more in the
gastric contents and consequently sediment more readily in the stomach.
(c)
pH of the solution. The pH of the barium sulphate solution should be
around 5•3, as more acid solutions tend to become more so in the gastric
contents and consequently precipitate more readily in the stomach.
(d)
Palatability. Undoubtedly ultrafine milling reduces much of the chalky
taste inherent in any barium sulphate/water mixture, but many commercial
preparations contain a flavouring agent which further disguises the
unpleasant taste. The barium sulphate/water mixture is usually 1/4
weight/volume, and has a viscosity of 15-20 cp, but thicker or thinner
suspensions may be used. Many commercial preparations contain
carboxymethyl cellulose (Raybar, Barosperse), which retains fluid and
prevents precipitation of the barium suspension in the normal small
bowel.
The development of the double contrast technique has
stressed the need for adequate mucosal coating and much of the present
manufacturing efforts are devoted to achieving this. An excess of mucus
and undue collection of fluid in the stomach greatly inhibit adequate
coating of the gastric mucosa, as does hypermotility of the stomach.
To
achieve double contrast examination of the stomach, air or carbon
dioxide gas must be introduced and there is no doubt that introduction
of air or gas via a nasogastric tube is the best means of obtaining a
controlled degree of gastric distension. However, the passage of a
gastric tube is an unpleasant procedure and is not acceptable to all
patients. Consequently most radiologists use effervescent tablets
(sodium bicarbonate 35 mg, tartaric acid 35 mg, calcium carbonate 50
mg) to react with the gastric contents to produce carbon dioxide.
The
amount of gas produced by these methods is variable and overdistension
of the stomach in the double contrast technique associated with poor
coating can be, from a diagnostic viewpoint, as disastrous as inadequate
distension. Some commercial preparations contain carbon dioxide gas
under pressure in the barium mixture, but usually the quantity of gas is
not adequate to produce good double contrast meals. An anti-foaming
agent may need to be added to some barium preparations to avoid the
formation of bubbles.
Water soluble iodine-containing contrast
media are of value when there is a suspected perforation or leakage of
an anastomosis after operation. The low radio-opacity of the iodine
compared with the barium, and the high osmolarity which results in
dilution within the small bowel, make it of little value for routine use
in investigation of the small bowel. Water soluble contrast media are
contraindicated if there is any danger of aspiration into the lungs.
IODINE PREPARATIONS
Since
their introduction in the 1950s, organic radiographic iodinated
contrast medium (ICM) have been among the most commonly prescribed drugs
in the history of modern medicine. The phenomenon of present-day
radiologic imaging would be lacking without these agents. ICM generally
have a good safety record. Adverse effects from the intravascular
administration of ICM are generally mild and self-limited; reactions
that occur from the extravascular use of ICM are rare. Nonetheless,
severe or life-threatening reactions can occur wAll currently used ICM
are chemical modifications of a 2,4,6-tri-iodinated benzene ring. They
are classified on the basis of their physical and chemical
characteristics, including their chemical structure, osmolality, iodine
content, and ionization in solution. In clinical practice,
categorization based on osmolality is widely used. ith either route of
administration.
Types of Iodinated Contrast Medium
The
more iodine, the more "dense" the x-ray effect. There are many
different molecules. Some examples of organic iodine molecules are
iohexol, iodixanol, ioversol. Iodine based contrast media are water
soluble and as harmless as possible to the body. These contrast medium
are sold as clear colorless water solutions, the concentration is
usually expressed as mg I/ml. Modern iodinated contrast medium can be
used almost anywhere in the body. Most often they are used
intravenously, but for various purposes they can also be used
intraarterially, intrathecally (the spine) and intraabdominally - just
about any body cavity or potential space. The contras medium both ionic
and non-ionic consist of monomer (1 benzoate acid ring) and dimmer ( 2
benzoate acid ring).
High-osmolality contrast media
Ionic monomers
High-osmolality
contrast media consist of a tri-iodinated benzene ring with 2 organic
side chains and a carboxyl group. The iodinated anion, diatrizoate or
iothalamate, is conjugated with a cation, sodium or meglumine; the
result is an ionic monomer. The ionization at the carboxyl-cation bond
makes the agent water soluble. Thus, for every 3 iodine atoms, 2
particles are present in solution (ie, a ratio of 3:2).
The
osmolality in solution ranges from 600 to 2100 mOsm/kg, versus 290
mOsm/kg for human plasma. The osmolality is related to some of the
adverse events of these contrast media.Ionic monomers are subclassified
by the percentage weight of the contrast agent molecule in solution
Low-osmolality contrast media
There are 3 types of low-osmolality ICM:, (1) ionic dimers, (2) nonionic monomers and (3) nonionic dimers.
Ionic dimers
Ionic
dimers are formed by joining 2 ionic monomers and eliminating 1
carboxyl group. These agents contain 6 iodine atoms for every 2
particles in solution (ie, a ratio of 6:2). The only commercially
available ionic dimer is ioxaglate. Ioxaglate has a concentration of
59%, or 320 mg I/mL, and an osmolality of 600 mOsm/kg. Because of its
high viscosity, ioxaglate is not manufactured at higher concentrations.
Ioxaglate is used primarily for peripheral arteriography.
Nonionic monomers
In
nonionic monomers, the tri-iodinated benzene ring is made water soluble
by the addition of hydrophilic hydroxyl groups to organic side chains
that are placed at the 1, 3, and 5 positions. Lacking a carboxyl group,
nonionic monomers do not ionize in solution. Thus, for every 3 iodine
atoms, only 1 particle is present in solution (ie, a ratio of 3:1).
Therefore, at a given iodine concentration, nonionic monomers have
approximately one half the osmolality of ionic monomers in solution. At
normally used concentrations, 25-76%, nonionic monomers have 290-860
mOsm/kg.
Nonionic monomers are subclassified according to the number
of milligrams of iodine in 1 mL of solution (eg, 240, 300, or 370 mg
I/mL).
The larger side chains increase the viscosity of nonionic
monomers compared with ionic monomers. The increased viscosity makes
nonionic monomers harder to inject, but it does not appear to be related
to the frequency of adverse events.
Common nonionic monomers are iohexol, iopamidol, ioversol, and iopromide.
The
nonionic monomers are the contrast agents of choice. In addition to
their nonionic nature and lower osmolalities, they are potentially less
chemotoxic than the ionic monomers.
Nonionic dimers
Nonionic
dimers consist of 2 joined nonionic monomers. These substances contain 6
iodine atoms for every 1 particle in solution (ie, ratio of 6:1). For a
given iodine concentration, the nonionic dimers have the lowest
osmolality of all the contrast agents. At approximately 60%
concentration by weight, these agents are iso-osmolar with plasma. They
are also highly viscous and, thus, have limited clinical usefulness
An
older type of contrast medium, Thorotrast was based on thorium dioxide,
but this was abandoned since it turned out to be carcinogenic.
Properties of Iodine Contrast Medium
Osmolality,
viscosity, and iodine concentration are three physico-chemical
properties that are inter-related with each other, and are also
influenced vy the structure and size of the iodine-binding molecule. The
expression of each property can vary greatly among contras medium
During
the last decade, innovations in the field of X-ray contras medium have
focused on manipulation of these properties. However, due to their
relatedness, a change in one property may cause a change in another one,
at times unfavourably so. For example, effort to decrease osmolality
have led to iso-osmolar product however, it has been at the cost of an
unwanted higher level of viscosity.
Osmolality is a count of the
number of particles in a fluid sample. The unit for counting is the mole
which is equal to 6.02 x 1023 particles (Avogadro's Number). Molarity
is the number of particles of a particular substance in a volume of
fluid (eg mmol/L) and molality is the number of particles disolved in a
mass weight of fluid (mmol/kg). Osmolality is a count of the total
number of osmotically active particles in a solution and is equal to the
sum of the molalities of all the solutes present in that solution. For
most biological systems the molarity and the molality of a solution are
nearly exactly equal because the density of water is 1 kg/L. There is a
slight difference between molality and molarity in plasma because of the
non-aqueous components present such as proteins and lipids which make
up about 6% of the total volume. Thus serum is only 94% water and the
molality of a substance in serum is about 6% higher than its molarity.
Osmolality can be calculated by the following formulation :
Many of the side effects are due to the hyperosmolar solution being injected. i.e. they deliver more iodine atoms per molecule.
Side-effects of Iodine contrast medium (ICM)
The
use of Iodine contrast medium (ICM) may cause untoward side ffects and
manifestations of anaphylaxis. The symptoms include nousea, vomiting,
widespread erythema, generalized heat sensation, headache, coryza or
laryngeal edema, fever, sweating, asthenia, dizziness, pallor, dyspnoea
and moderate hypotension. More severe reaction involving the
cardiovasluar system such as peripheral vasodilation with pronounced
hypotension, tachycardia, dyspnoea, agitation, cyanosis and loss of
consciousness, may require emergency treatment. For these reason the use
of contrast medium must be limited to cases for which the diagnostic
procedure is definitely indicated
Side effects in association with
the intravascular use of iodinated contrast medium are ussually of a
mild to moderate and temporary nature, and are less frequent with
non-ionic than with ionic preparations..
Adverse reactions to ICM are
classified as idiosyncratic and nonidiosyncratic.The pathogenesis of
such adverse reactions probably involves direct cellular effects; enzyme
induction; and activation of the complement, fibrinolytic, kinin, and
other systems.
Idiosyncratic reactions
Idiosyncratic
reactions typically begin within 20 minutes of the ICM injection,
independent of the dose that is administered. A severe idiosyncratic
reaction can occur after an injection of less than 1 mL of a contrast
agent.
Although reactions to ICM have the same manifestations as
anaphylactic reactions, these are not true hypersensitivity reactions.
Immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies are not involved. In addition,
previous sensitization is not required, nor do these reactions
consistently recur in a given patient. For these reasons, idiosyncratic
reactions to ICM are called anaphylactic reactions.
Anaphylactoid reactions
Anaphylactoid
reactions occur rarely (Karnegis and Heinz, 1979; Lasser et al, 1987;
Greenberger and Patterson, 1988), but can occur in response to injected
as well as oral and rectal contrast and even retrograde pyelography.
They are similar in presentation to anaphylactic reactions, but are not
caused by an IgE-mediated immune response. Patients with a history of
contrast reactions, however, are at increased risk of anaphylactoid
reactions (Greenberger and Patterson, 1988; Lang et al, 1993).
Pretreatment with corticosteroids has been shown to decrease the
incidence of adverse reactions (Lasser et al, 1988; Greenberger et al,
1985; Wittbrodt and Spinler, 1994). The symptoms of anaphylactic
reaction can be classified as mild, moderate, and severe.
Mild symptoms
Mild
symptoms include the following: scattered urticaria, which is the most
commonly reported adverse reaction; pruritus; rhinorrhea; nausea, brief
retching, and/or vomiting; diaphoresis; coughing; and dizziness.
Patients with mild symptoms should be observed for the progression or
evolution of a more severe reaction, which requires treatment.
Moderate symptoms
Moderate
symptoms include the following: persistent vomiting; diffuse urticaria;
headache; facial edema; laryngeal edema; mild bronchospasm or dyspnea;
palpitations, tachycardia, or bradycardia; hypertension; and abdominal
cramps.
Severe symptoms
Severe symptoms include the
following: life-threatening arrhythmias (ie, ventricular tachycardia),
hypotension, overt bronchospasm, laryngeal edema, pulmonary edema,
seizures, syncope, and death.
Anaphylactoid reactions range from
urticaria and itching, to bronchospasm and facial and laryngeal edema.
For simple cases of urticaria and itching, Benadryl (diphenhydramine)
oral or IV is appropriate. For more severe reactions, including
bronchospasm and facial or neck edema, albuterol inhaler, or
subcutaneous or IV epinephrine, plus diphenhydramine may be needed. If
respiration is compromised, an airway must be established prior to
medical management.
Nonidiosyncratic reactions
Nonidiosyncratic
reactions include the following: bradycardia, hypotension, and
vasovagal reactions; neuropathy; cardiovascular reactions;
extravasation; and delayed reactions. Other nonidiosyncratic reactions
include sensations of warmth, a metallic taste in the mouth, and nausea
and vomiting.
Bradycardia, hypotension, and vasovagal reactions
By
inducing heightened systemic parasympathetic activity, ICM can
precipitate bradycardia (eg, decreased discharge rate of the sinoatrial
node, delayed atrioventricular nodal conduction) and peripheral
vasodilatation. The end result is systemic hypotension with bradycardia.
This may be accompanied by other autonomic manifestations, including
nausea, vomiting, diaphoresis, sphincter dysfunction, and mental status
changes. Untreated, these effects can lead to cardiovascular collapse
and death. Some vasovagal reactions may be a result of coexisting
circumstances such as emotion, apprehension, pain, and abdominal
compression, rather than ICM administration.
Cardiovascular reactions
ICM
can cause hypotension and bradycardia. Vasovagal reactions, a direct
negative inotropic effect on the myocardium, and peripheral
vasodilatation probably contribute to these effects. The latter 2
effects may represent the actions of cardioactive and vasoactive
substances that are released after the anaphylactic reaction to the ICM.
This effect is generally self-limiting, but it can also be an indicator
of a more severe, evolving reaction.
ICM can lower the ventricular
arrhythmia threshold and precipitate cardiac arrhythmias and cardiac
arrest. Fluid shifts due to an infusion of hyperosmolar intravascular
fluid can produce an intravascular hypervolemic state, systemic
hypertension, and pulmonary edema. Also, ICM can precipitate angina.
The
similarity of the cardiovascular and anaphylactic reactions to ICM can
create confusion in identifying the true nature of the type and severity
of an adverse reaction; this confusion can lead to the overtreatment or
undertreatment of symptoms.
Other nonidiosyncratic reactions include
syncope; seizures; and the aggravation of underlying diseases,
including pheochromocytomas, sickle cell anemia, hyperthyroidism, and
myasthenia gravis.
Extravasation
Extravasation
of ICM into soft tissues during an injection can lead to tissue damage
as a result of direct toxicity of the contrast agent or pressure
effects, such as compartment syndrome.
Delayed reactions
Delayed
reactions become apparent at least 30 minutes after but within 7 days
of the ICM injection. These reactions are identified in as many as
14-30% of patients after the injection of ionic monomers and in 8-10% of
patients after the injection of nonionic monomers.
Common delayed
reactions include the development of flulike symptoms, such as the
following: fatigue, weakness, upper respiratory tract congestion,
fevers, chills, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, pain in the
injected extremity, rash, dizziness, and headache.
Less frequently reported manifestations are pruritus, parotitis, polyarthropathy, constipation, and depression.
These
signs and symptoms almost always resolve spontaneously; usually, little
or no treatment is required. Some delayed reactions may be
coincidental.
Nephropathy
Contrast-induced
nephropathy is defined as either a greater than 25% increase of serum
creatinine or an absolute increase in serum creatinine of 0.5 mg/dL.
Three factors have been associated with an increased risk of
contrast-induced nephropathy: preexisting renal insufficiency (such as
Creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min [1.00 mL/s] - calculator online
calculator), preexisting diabetes, and reduced intravascular volume
(McCullough, 1997; Scanlon et al, 1999).
The osmolality of the
contrast mdium is believed to be of great importance in contrast-induced
nephropathy. Ideally, the contrast agent should be isoosmolar to blood.
Modern iodinated contrast medium are non-ionic, the older ionic types
caused more adverse effects and are not used much anymore.
To
minimize the risk for contrast-induced nephropathy, various actions can
be taken if the patient has predisposing conditions. These have been
reviewed in a meta-analysis.
1. The dose of contrast medium should be as low as possible, while still being able to perform the necessary examination.
2. Non-ionic contrast medium
3.
Iso-osmolar, nonionic contrast medium. One randomized controlled trial
found that an iso-osmolar, nonionic agent was superior to a non-ionic
agent contrast media.
4. IV fluid hydration with saline. There is
debate as to the most effective means of IV fluid hydration. One method
is 1 mg/kg per hour for 6-12 hours before and after the the contrast.
5.
IV fluid hydration with saline plus sodium bicarbonate. As an
alternative to IV hydration with plain saline, administration of sodium
bicarbonate 3 mL/kg per hour for 1 hour before , followed by 1 mL/kg per
hour for 6 hours after contrast was found superior to plain saline on
one randomized controlled trial. This was subsequently corroborated by a
multi-center randomized controlled trial, which also demonstrated that
IV hydration with sodium bicarbonate was superior to 0.9% normal saline.
The renoprotective effects of bicarbonate are thought to be due to
urinary alkalinization, which creates an environment less amenable to
the formation of harmful free radicals.
6. N-acetylcysteine (NAC).
NAC, 600 mg orally twice a day, on the day before and of the procedure
if creatinine clearnace is estimated to be less than 60 mL/min [1.00
mL/s]). A randomized controlled trial found higher doses of NAC (1200-mg
IV bolus and 1200 mg orally twice daily for 2 days) benefited (relative
risk reduction of 74%) patients receiving coronary angioplasty with
higher volumes of contrast . Some recent studies suggest that
N-acetylcysteine protects the kidney from the toxic effects of the
contrast agent (Gleeson & Bulugahapitiya 2004). This effect is, in
any case, not overwhelming. Some researchers (e.g. Hoffmann et al 2004)
even claim that the effect is due to interference with the creatinine
laboratory test itself. This is supported by a lack of correlation
between creatinine levels and cystatin C levels.
Other
pharmacological agents, such as furosemide, mannitol, theophylline,
aminophylline, dopamine, and atrial natriuretic peptide have been tried,
but have either not had beneficial effects, or had detrimental effects
(Solomon et al, 1994; Abizaid et al, 1999).
No comments:
Post a Comment